@aliteralvirus @setoacnna To not make gametes you would have to be born without testes or ovaries (very rare, but I am sure there are some case studies). Most without these organs are not XX or XY Interesting review on why nature decided to go with a asymm
@natprance @mentalplex @WEschenbach @nberlat @roderickgraham Just in case you missed it. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@natprance @mentalplex @WEschenbach @nberlat @roderickgraham OK Nat. Let’s start with this paper, as it addresses a number of your concerns about the fundamental nature of what a sex is and how many have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@RemcodeBrouwer @Sanspareille @JamesLJvR @dennismolema @BlendleNL @HPdeTijdNL Ja, dat zal het probleem zijn... 😏https://t.co/HHnlggsj3o
@aroakland @KSpence88 Here's another. I mean we can go all day if you like but I have presented some stuff to you, now can you tell me what the other sexes are and what their role in reproduction (which defines sex) is? Then we can discuss https://t.co/Ds
@MechaDeathFrog @halomancer1 @threeteapots @a_salty_pinch @connorperrett No idealism; simply biology: https://t.co/HHnlggsj3o https://t.co/be0KIuOWJG
@SVersiv Da das tatsächlich immer wieder gebracht wird und einfach nicht verstanden wird, dass uralte Tatsachen nicht immer neu gefunden werden müssen, hier eine recht gute Quelle dazu, dass Zweigeschlechtigkeit entstanden ist und warum sie sich bis jetzt
RT @lecanardnoir: @wildswan @AlbertoCairo @MattWalshBlog Here is one on how the sexes evolved and why it produced two - and only two -types…
@wildswan @AlbertoCairo @MattWalshBlog Here is one on how the sexes evolved and why it produced two - and only two -types, defined by one of the two asymmetrical gamete types. Have these biologists got the count wrong on the number of sexes? https://t.c
@JohanDH4 @LowInfoJoe1 @AlexWilde87 @_samanthalux This paper is quite good on explaining why two and only two sexes have evolved. And what a sex actually is. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@AubinMagnus @halomancer1 @SpiderJ @zaelefty @XtinaGrimwade @LGBwiththeT The name of the paper is in the image that Zach provided, but I can easily provide many more peer reviewed biology papers that define the sexes by gametes. Do you have one that define
@LucyLauser @HistoricalNoOne @byebyebirry @RodeToSurfdom @JudySan14557592 @KristiNoem For the other people still in doubt about the definition of the sexes though: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @logi_con: @FlipyTalk @nabrix72 @Dan_Arrows I've copied another acedemic paper in reply to your tweet re biological sex determination bu…
@Tom_Norm @StopfordianR @NettiLDN https://t.co/VPsbGPDBPE In this paper, biologists discus why 2 sexes have evolved. We can see that each sex arises directly from there being 2 distinct gamete types that lead to two distinct reproductive roles. Are these
@QWieke This paper provides some interesting information as to WHY evolution developed the sexes this way, if you're interested: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @lecanardnoir: @Mnemosyne1337 @CheneyForPrison @FredZembo @Timcast And those ancestors have given rise to the two distinct sexes we see…
@Mnemosyne1337 @CheneyForPrison @FredZembo @Timcast And those ancestors have given rise to the two distinct sexes we see now. Two very discrete sexes. Not a spectrum of sexes. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@FeliciaEntwined @etotheipie @edillades @ETVPod @Moonlitpiglet @Skepticallefty Can we agree that this paper quite clearly states why two sexes have evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@etotheipie @FeliciaEntwined @edillades @ETVPod @Moonlitpiglet @Skepticallefty Can we agree that two sexes have evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@etotheipie @FeliciaEntwined @edillades @ETVPod @Moonlitpiglet @Skepticallefty So a paper that described why only two sexes have evolved. Can we agree that only two sexes have evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ClubAtheists @SwipeWright @RichardDawkins Happy to explain in greater detail why human sex isn’t binary under this understanding. And here’s a citation for the aforementioned definition of sex: https://t.co/iZp2QExRi5
@machetemom @LunarMariaRilke @FondOfBeetles @AbsMcFabs @ETVPod How about another peer reviewed biological paper? Its clear you follow pseudo nonsense https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@MrPogy @jk_rowling Better yet, I can show you: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg https://t.co/LglW70TU0n
@MechaniVal @etotheipie @2damntrans @ETVPod @lecanardnoir @FondOfBeetles @OwnerOfIdeas How is it contingent on physical characteristics? https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@maiakm @melissawright75 @NadiaJacobsen3 Don't be ridiculous. Even the dictionary knows the definition. You just don't like how biology defines the sexes. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg https://t.co/NlsnR5c3eC
@Arthur_Carlyle @OnlyIndieRadio @DragonNexus @Moppettshow The same way as with every other human: by looking at their reproductive anatomy. As for your earlier question: it has everything to do with it, because that's how biology defines the sexes. https:/
@UnnamedDeluca @jen_galvinized @roderickgraham @FondOfBeetles Sex is of course binary No peer reviewed biological paper supports a view that sex is not binary https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@SteveCl58542482 @DominiqueTaegon @thejamesmax @chrisrankin So what you're really saying is that you don't know how biology defines the sexes? Let me help you with that: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@beaterast Berre at den tråden er misvisande og ikkje seier kva kjønn _er_. Ho hoppar glatt bukk over at kjønn er knytta til reproduktiv evne og kjønncelleproduksjon. Det er knapt nokon som hevdar at kjønn=kromosom, og dei som seier tar uansett feil. https
@FlipyTalk @nabrix72 @Dan_Arrows I've copied another acedemic paper in reply to your tweet re biological sex determination but this one covers some more fundamentals re gamete roles and evolution https://t.co/NBVgUxDoGu
@MBones798 @FlagranteBasta1 @Hebsevenfour @IHateTDSTelecom @Katheri96958317 @lewisjwr Ah. OK. Let's do that then! Shall we start with the biological literature on how sex evolved and the outcome of that evolution? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6 This paper clea
RT @lecanardnoir: @ShirubaGaunna @Ineffablecando1 @ImperioDohaeris @edwards2779 @D_C_75 @TitaniaMcGrath A sex is a reproductive role associ…
@lascapigliata8 “we must be clear about how the two sexes are defined in a broad sense: males are those individuals that produce the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), while females are defined as those that produce the larger gametes ” https://t.co/T0pH9d4Bzn
RT @lecanardnoir: @ShirubaGaunna @Ineffablecando1 @ImperioDohaeris @edwards2779 @D_C_75 @TitaniaMcGrath A sex is a reproductive role associ…
@ShirubaGaunna @Ineffablecando1 @ImperioDohaeris @edwards2779 @D_C_75 @TitaniaMcGrath A sex is a reproductive role associated with a gamete type in anisogamy. Would you like some peer reviewed citations from the biology literature? For example, https:
@LunaNotLunar_ @shutmyeyestosee @TheLadyLustre @TryingMaybe @CathRobilliard @spikedonline @8RosarioSanchez So basically what you're saying here is that you don't know how biology defines the sexes? Perhaps this will help: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @lecanardnoir: @TryingMaybe @LunaNotLunar_ @TheLadyLustre @CathRobilliard @spikedonline @8RosarioSanchez Here is a good paper on why two…
RT @lecanardnoir: @TryingMaybe @LunaNotLunar_ @TheLadyLustre @CathRobilliard @spikedonline @8RosarioSanchez Here is a good paper on why two…
@TryingMaybe @LunaNotLunar_ @TheLadyLustre @CathRobilliard @spikedonline @8RosarioSanchez Here is a good paper on why two and only two sexes have evolved. It shows how each sex is defined with respect to a gamete type. What do you think they have got wro
@tlkinboutpraxis @DennisT47365689 @SwipeWright You have disproven nothing. You simply do your utmost to misunderstand biological definitions. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@FennoGroenwold @justz571 @MariekeBIoos @nrc Misschien helpt dit: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@flickeringdust_ @JamesEsses We can concentrate on this paper to begin with as there is a lot in here. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@flickeringdust_ @JamesEsses Here is a paper that discusses the number of sexes that have evolved and why that number has evolved. There are quite a few clues in the paper as to why my dog, parrot and daughter are female and other things. https://t.co/
@EverydayisWedn3 @MabeeJoe Und, hast du einen Beweis für mehr als zwei Geschlechter? Und bitte komm mir nicht mit "Es gibt kein biologisches Geschlecht", weil sich weniger komplexe Organismen anders fortpflanzen, du bist keine asexuelle Amöbe, sonst hättes
@FemgirlVR @endofpatriarchy @jk_rowling Would you like to see the peer reviewed biology as to how a sex is defined? This is a very good paper on how and why only two sexes evolved. You can see the concept of sex is tied uniquely to gamete types. The spectr
@AboutLungCancer @MarnoASMRFan @RuthHay96406976 @Franklin_Graham Let’s look at some actuyal biology papers - you do not need to trust my authority - I ask you to trust the authority of the peer reviewed literature. This paper describes how two discrete s
@kungfuXander @Rationalist69 @2wist @YMidtownL @AbigailShrier Here is a paper that discusses the evolution of sexes and why the number that did above was inevitable. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@DrDMcGregor @GP_SexualHealth … howe many have evolved. A sex is an evolved,ved reproductive function based on a gamete type. There are two gamete types s0 two sexes. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Clorff @cestlaluxure @ladylafleurr @Ogajodascausas @prontapratreta eu constatei um facto biológico. se houvesse a descoberta dum terceiro gâmeta nos humanos isso seria revolucionário. mas não houve, porque não existe, só existem dois. https://t.co/pQXIIEI
@godless_mom Just so you know, we've all seen this before. We are not stunned and amazed by a new revelation. We have seen it many times. It was rubbish the first time, and it's still rubbish. Now, if it's genuine scientific data you want, start here
RT @lecanardnoir: @davidra @zeno001 @olan4833 @NoahCarl90 Would you like me to re link to the papers? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@davidra @zeno001 @olan4833 @NoahCarl90 Would you like me to re link to the papers? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @lecanardnoir: @davidra @olan4833 @NoahCarl90 Well - we can see many papers that describe sex a discrete and based on function. That two…
@davidra @olan4833 @NoahCarl90 Well - we can see many papers that describe sex a discrete and based on function. That two such reproductive functions have evolved - what is popularly called a binary. This paper describes why two discrete sexes evolved fo
@stinkerino @Shariinthesky @realDailyWire @MattWalshBlog Why would I waste time searching for a paper that doesn't exist? I suggest you read this peer-reviewed biology paper on the subject: https://t.co/BxaaKP5Mx6
@Smoothsinger317 @zwitterio @wheelyperverted @sgiansmith @msanthropetweet @cmclymer Indeed. But science is not arbitrarily ‘made up”. Science tests itself against empirical reality - that is how it becomes reliable. And right now, the empirical reality i
@Redstar1381 @StoneyGuardian @FondOfBeetles @pzmyers @MrPeterLMorris @janeclarejones Here is a paper explaining why two and only two sexes have evolved. It explains what a sex is. This will clear up your fundamental conclusion. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@aicilalewis @DishonestApe @LittleRedChevet @Seculoid @Yes92539490 @coccinellanovem @Matt_Dillahunty @RichardDawkins Well, you are obviously more curious an intellectually brave than @DishonestApe. So, where to begin? How about how the two sexes evolved
Ok gametes exist, what's your point
There are more than 2 sexes. There are roughly about 150 million #intersex people globally, which is more people than what most countries have including Russia❗ 🟨🟣🟨 🌎 🟨☮🟨 🌍 🟨⚧🟨 🌏 🟨💜🟨 🇺🇳
@LSMakeUp No new sexes are created by intersex or by being infertile. That is a massive conceptual muddle. Here you can see how biologists understand why only two discrete sexes have evolved. What have they got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@LSMakeUp Lucie - how do biologists define what a sex is? Here is a biology paper that shows how two and only two sexes have evolved and defines a sex with respect to a gamete type. What have they got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @lecanardnoir: @MceBauer @emma_dewaal @KatyMontgomerie @RichardDawkins A sex is an evolved reproductive role based on a gamete type. T…
@MceBauer @emma_dewaal @KatyMontgomerie @RichardDawkins A sex is an evolved reproductive role based on a gamete type. This peer reviewed paper gos into a lot of detail about how the sexes evolves, why there are just two, and how each sex is defined. htt
@Davouts @watsonsnoodle @FondOfBeetles @AliceDreger It is like trying to explain quantum mechanics to my dog. Here is a paper on why two discrete sexes have evolved as a result of runaway gamete divergence. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@CrowQuell @BraedenTimlin @DaytimePubSmell @_Sunshinebeam_ @YiPeaches @salltweets @RichardDawkins https://t.co/ZDx89ggBpb ‘Molecular Human Reproduction’ journal - on evolution of the two sexes
@ojstupidfried You can't properly ask a question and attempt to put words in my mouth, creating a strawman. I refuse to participate in such a dishonest discussion. Of you're unfamiliar with basic biology, check the glossary in this paper, for example, I'm
RT @lecanardnoir: @fozmeadows Foz. In this paper, biologists discus why 2 sexes have evolved. We can see that each sex arises directly from…
RT @zaelefty: This evolutionary biology paper on the evolution of two sexes, by Lehtonen & Parker, is the gold standard for explaining why…
@Davouts @ziltam @swansonian12 @ItsMeSamiC @jessphillips @dsdfamilies https://t.co/VPsbGPDBPE Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes
@iramjohn @huwigs @AliceDreger The point is no peer reviewed biological papers backs her position there is more than tow sexes, using sex specific conditions I already posted this to you as well: https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@iramjohn @huwigs @AliceDreger Still waiting on those papers you claim back your position I have other papers of course: https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@ryaniskindagay @g0d5t0n3 @anarnicky @ken3598 @AbigailShrier It is not cleat to you as a non-biologist, but you have very strong opinions nonetheless. I see. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper that answers these questions. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ahor_ye Have these biologists got it wrong when they describe in this paper why and how only two sexes has evolved? What is their error? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Leeningtowerof2 @lecanardnoir @sharpergrey This is by actual scientists: https://t.co/RN6UYQa84e
Jussi Lehtonen and Geoff A. Parker, 2014. Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes. Molecular Human Reproduction, Volume 20, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 1161–1168, https://t.co/fgsynr0aPq, 16 October 2014.
RT @lecanardnoir: @fozmeadows Foz. In this paper, biologists discus why 2 sexes have evolved. We can see that each sex arises directly from…
RT @DigbyOakes: @MatthewStadlen @MForstater Male is defined as: "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces…
RT @lecanardnoir: @fozmeadows Foz. In this paper, biologists discus why 2 sexes have evolved. We can see that each sex arises directly from…
RT @lecanardnoir: @fozmeadows Foz. In this paper, biologists discus why 2 sexes have evolved. We can see that each sex arises directly from…
RT @DigbyOakes: @MatthewStadlen @MForstater Male is defined as: "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces…
RT @lecanardnoir: @fozmeadows Foz. In this paper, biologists discus why 2 sexes have evolved. We can see that each sex arises directly from…
@MatthewStadlen @MForstater Male is defined as: "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes in anisogamous systems." Are you saying the peer reviewed literature is transphobic? https://t.co/oNDjWRp1re
@PaulEmbery Quick answer: Gametes. Medium answer: Gametes are either small or large, the biological outcome is either ovum which characterise the female or sperm (the male). An adult human male/female is a man/woman. Long answer: https://t.co/dXuWUTWC5r
RT @zaelefty: This evolutionary biology paper on the evolution of two sexes, by Lehtonen & Parker, is the gold standard for explaining why…